Thirty Feet From Genius

The queue in the back of the court gets big. Across the net, Bob and Mike Bryan hit balls with some thirty amateurs — all guests of the Gillette Federer Tour in São Paulo. Some hopeful ones even try to beat the twins playing points. Other just want to hit the most number os balls they can. The tennis clinic in the Ibirapuera indoor court is well under way when I get there and move to the back of the line.I do not get to hit a single ball with the Bryans. As I was getting close to the baseline, we hear the buzz courtside. One of the most famous figures in sporting history is coming out of the dressing room. The blue sponsor-colored shirt and the yellow bandana leave little room for doubt. It's Roger Federer stepping into the court. The queue breaks. Everyone runs towards the Swiss. In a matter of seconds, the winningest doubles team in history is all but forgotten.A different, bigger queue quickly takes shape. With no warm up or even a single ball hit, my first task is to return a serve from Roger. The man, the myth, the legend is across the net, some 75 feet from me. The ball leaves his racquet at half speed. The Swiss knows how to play amateurs. It's not his first time around wannabes. My legs are not quite there. I have not felt this tense in a tennis court since probably my first beginner-level tournament. Luckily, I manage to return the ball deep enough. My "opponent" jokes and lets out a Rafa-like grunt. I laugh on the inside. I grunt back, hit another ball safely into the court.As the little yellow ball travels, I get ready for another "Federer forehand", the most feared shot in history. Mastered to perfection, taught by tennis tennis instructors everywhere. The one stroke that defines "by the book". I would seen it happen a few minutes earlier. After hitting about four with one of the guests, Roger ripped one true Federer Forehand. The ball traveled like a bullet train, leaving the crowd and the "opponent" in awe. Jaws dropped.So that's what it feels like for opponents. That's how it is for the pros. That's when it hits me. I am trading forehands with Roger Federer! The man who spent more weeks at the top of the ranking then anyone else. My legs freeze, I take the first step towards the ball a second slow and get there late. The ball stops at the net. I am still smiling. Ca not help it.After a few minutes, the queue is a mess. Guys hand their mobile phones to whoever is closest. Everyone wants a video, a photo, a token of those few seconds spent in the same court as Roger. Playing him — or with him — is a privilege, the memory of a lifetime, a story to tell the wife. Or a mother who happens to be a crazy fan of the Swiss. Later, she would cry hearing the news.Mike Bryan and Roger decide to change things and ask for two lines. The few on the right would hit with the American. The many on the left, like me, would play 30 feet from the 17-time Grand Slam champion. I hit a forehand and a backhand before going back to the end of the line. Other guests are still having trouble keeping their jaws locked. Excited, nervous, happy, ecstatic. There's a little bit of everything in that baseline queue.I am again 30 feet away from Roger. I notice how effortlessly he hits back every (good and bad) ball pushed at him. I would seen the former number one in the world up-close in practices and Grand Slam matches. Also in interview rooms. Nothing quite compared to holding a racquet and sharing a court with the biggest name in the sport I covered professionally.At the end, I am no longer tense. I hit around 15 balls from Roger, I think. Given all that's reported in the previous paragraphs, my count might lack precision. I do remember well the last one though. I take two steps to the right and let out a great (for my standards) forehand. The Swiss looks at me and says "good movement. " Magic words for an overweight amateur. Even then Roger'a a genius.

How can you defeat a genius?

Plant a doubt in his/her mind. Your work is done. Sit back and enjoy the destruction that follows.

recommended articles
Claude Shannon: How a Genius Solves Problems
It took Claude Shannon about a decade to fully formulate his seminal theory of information.He first flirted with the idea of establishing a common foundation for the many information technologies of his day (like the telephone, the radio, and the television) in graduate school.It wasnt until 1948, however, that he published A Mathematical Theory of Communication. This wasnt his only big contribution, though. As a student at MIT, at the humble age of 21, he published a thesis that many consider possibly the most important masters thesis of the century.To the average person, this may not mean much. Hes not exactly a household name. But if it wasnt for Shannons work, what we think of as the modern computer may not exist. His influence is enormous not just in computer science, but also in physics and engineering.The word genius is thrown around casually, but there are very few people who actually deserve the moniker like Claude Shannon. He thought differently, and he thought playfully.One of the subtle causes behind what manifested as such genius, however, was the way he attacked problems. He didnt just formulate a question and then look for answers, but he was methodological in developing a process to help him see beyond what was in sight. His problems were different from many of the problems we are likely to deal with, but the template and its reasoning can be generalized to some degree, and when it is, it may just help us think sharper, too.All problems have a shape and a form. To solve them, we have to first understand them.Build a Core Before Filling the DetailsThe importance of getting to an answer isnt lost on any of us, but many of us do neglect how important it is to ask a question in such a way that an answer is actually available to us. We are quick to jump around from one detail to another, hoping that they eventually connect, rather than focusing our energy on developing an intuition for what it is we are working with.This is where Shannon did the opposite. In fact, as his biographers note in A Mind at Play, he did this to the point that some contemporary mathematicians thought that he wasnt as rigorous as he could be in the steps he was taking to build a coherent picture. They, naturally, wanted the details.Shannons reasoning, however, was that it isnt until you eliminate the inessential from the problem you are working on that you can see the core that will guide you to an answer. In fact, often, when you get to such a core, you may not even recognize the problem anymore, which illustrates how important it is to get the bigger picture right before you go chasing after the details. Otherwise, you start by pointing yourself in the wrong direction.Details are important and useful. Many details are actually disproportionately important and useful relative to their representation. But there are equally as many details that are useless.If you dont find the core of a problem, you start off with all of the wrong details, which is then going to encourage you to add many more of the wrong kinds of details until youre stuck.Starting by pruning away at what is unimportant is how you discipline yourself to see behind the fog created by the inessential. Thats when youll find the foundation you are looking for.Finding the true form of the problem is almost as important as the answer that comes after.Harness Restructuring and ContrastIn a speech given at Bell Labs in 1952 to his contemporaries, Shannon dived into how he primes his mind to think creatively when addressing things that are keeping him occupied. Beyond simplifying and looking for the core, he suggests something else something that may not seem to make a difference on the surface but is crucial for thinking differently.Frequently, when we have spent a lot of time thinking about a problem, we create a tunnel vision that rigidly directs us along a singular path. Logical thinking starts at one point, makes reasoned connections, and if done well, it always leads to the same place every time. Creative thinking is a little different. It, too, makes connections, but these connections are less logical and more serendipitous, allowing for what we think of as new thinking patterns.One of Shannons go-to tricks was to restructure and contrast the problem in as many different ways as possible. This could mean exaggerating it, minimizing it, changing the words of how it is stated, reframing the angle from where it is looked at, and inverting it. The point of this exercise is simply to get a more holistic look at what is actually going on.Its easy for our brain to get stuck in mental loops, and the best way to break these mental loops is to change the reference point. We are not changing our intuitive understanding of the problem or the core we have identified, just how it is expressed. We could, for example, ask: What is the best way to solve this? But we could also ask: What is the worst way to solve this? Each contains knowledge, and we should dissect both.Just as a problem has forms, it also has many shapes. Different shapes hold different truths.Multiply the Essence of Every InputWhile its important to focus on the quality of ideas, its perhaps just as important to think about the quantity. Not just concerning total numbers but also how you get to those numbers.To solve a problem, you have to have a good idea. In turn, to have a good idea, its often the case that you have to first go through many bad ones. Even so, however, throwing anything and everything at the wall isnt the way to do that. There is more to it than that.During the Second World War, Shannon met Alan Turing, another computer science pioneer. While Turing was in the US, they had tea almost every day. Over the years, they continued to keep in touch, and both men respected the others thinking and enjoyed his company.When discussing what he thinks constitutes genius, Shannon used an analogy shared with him by Turing, from which he extrapolated a subtle observation. In his own words:There are some people if you shoot one idea into the brain, you will get a half an idea out. There are other people who are beyond this point at which they produce two ideas for each idea sent in.He humbly denied that he was in the latter category, instead putting people like Newton in there. But if we look beyond that, we can see what is at play. Its not just about quantity. Every input has a particular essence at its core that communicates a truth that lies behind the surface. This truth is the foundation for many different solutions to many different problems.What Shannon is getting at, I suspect, is that generating good ideas is about getting good at multiplying the essence of every input. Bad ideas may be produced if you get the essence wrong, but the better you identify it, the more effectively youll be able to uncover insights.Doubling the output of your ideas is the first step, but capturing the essence is the difference.All You Need to KnowMuch of life whether its in your work, or in your relationships, or as it relates to your well-being comes down to identifying and attacking a problem so that you can move past it. Claude Shannon may have been a singular genius with a unique mind, but the process he used isnt out of reach for any of us. His strength was in this process and its application.Good problem-solving is a product of both critical and creative thinking. The best way to combine them is to have some process in place that allows each to shine through.Thinking patterns shape our minds. The goal is to have the right thinking patterns doing so.Want more?I write about philosophy, science, art, and history for a private community of smart, curious people. Join 40,000 readers for exclusive access
Who Is the Name of That Guy in a Wheel Chair and Talks Like a Robot I Heard He's Some Kind of Genius
15 Genius Ways to Save Space in Your Suitcase - Hostelbookers
Bamboo Wacom Tablet Vs Genius Tablet. Which One Should I Buy?
Is Rap Poetry? the Genius of East Coast Rap in the 90's
Genius Playlist Survey #8: Tom Sawyer (Rush) and Others?
related searches
Is Rap Poetry? the Genius of East Coast Rap in the 90's
Genius Playlist Survey #8: Tom Sawyer (Rush) and Others?
Who Is the Name of That Guy in a Wheel Chair and Talks Like a Robot I Heard He's Some Kind of Genius
15 Genius Ways to Save Space in Your Suitcase - Hostelbookers
Bamboo Wacom Tablet Vs Genius Tablet. Which One Should I Buy?
Claude Shannon: How a Genius Solves Problems
Tips on Using Mop & Glo
White Stains in My T-Shirts?
Drilling Holes in Hard Porcelain Tiles with Diamond Drill Bits Holesaws Granite and Marble

Copyright © 2020 Concises YuGa Sports | Sitemap