HELP ASAP. Only Where A2,b-1 and C0 Are Different, Can You Solve the Differential Equation (dy/dt/ax

You need to think a bit before you start panicking. It would help.

Put those values in:

dx/dt ax by

dy/dt cx dy

where a 2, b -1, c 0, d 0


dx/dt 2x - y

dy/dt 0

Now I really hope you can solve the equation dy/dt 0. From there it's not hard to solve for x:

dx/dt - 2x -y -k (where y k is a constant)

Multiply by the integrating factor e^(-2t):

e^(-2t) dx/dt - 2x e^(-2t) -k e^(-2t)

> d/dt (x e^(-2t)) -k e^(-2t)

> x e^(-2t) -k e^(-2t) / (-2) c

> x k/2 ce^(2t).

So the solution is x(t) k/2 ce^(2t), y(t) k for arbitrary constants c and k. You can check that this works: dy/dt 0, of course, and dx/dt 2c e^(2t) 2x - k 2x - y.

• Related Questions

How to prove that f(x) cx for some constant c that is an element of real numbers?

This is Cauchys functional equation. We will prove that

f(x)cx for all real x.

Proof: It is easy to show for positive integers n,

f(nx) nf(x)

which can be established by induction. Note that setting x1 and nk gives f(k)kf(1) for all positive integers k.

To prove for positive rationals, let xm/n. Then nxm and f(nx)f(m). So,

f(nx) nf(x) f(m) mf(1)


f(m/n) f(x) (m/n)f(1)

which shows that f(x) cx for all positive rationals, x.

For negative rationals and x0 it is obvious that,

f(x) f(-x) f(x (-x)) f(0) 0 f(-x) -f(x) -cx f(x) cx for all rational x.

To complete the proof, we note that if f:RR and g: RR are continuous such that f(q)g(q) for rational q, then f(x) g(x) for all real numbers x. This follows from taking limits on f(x) and g(x) as they are both continuous.



What is Orthogonal trajectories in Differential equation is x^(2) y Cx - y?

The differential equation which generates the family of curves

xy Cx - y

can be found solving the previous wrt C

C y(x 1)/x

and differentiating both sides wrt x

xy' (x 1) 2xy - y(x 1)/x 0

xy'(x 1) 2xy - xy - y/x 0

xy'(x 1) 2xy - xy - y 0

solve wrt y'

y' y(1 - x)/(x(x 1))

and then substitute y' with - 1/y' because tangents must be perpendicular at each point

- 1/y' y(1 - x)/(x(x 1))

y' (x(x 1))/(y(x - 1))

separate variables

y dy x(x 1)/(x - 1) dx

y dy (x x)/(x - 1) dx

y dy x 2x/(x - 1) dx

use partial fractions to simplify

2x/(x - 1) 2x/((x 1)(x - 1)) A/(x 1) B/(x - 1) (A B)x (A - B)/((x 1)(x - 1))

A B 0

A - B 2..............A 1, B - 1

x 2x/(x - 1) x 1/(x 1) - 1/(x - 1)

integrate both sides

y/2 x/2 log(x 1) - log(x - 1) D

y x 2 log(x 1)/(x - 1) K

hope it helps


Find the function f(x) ax^3 bx^2 cx d?

Here the task is to find the value of a,b,

C, and d . And to put these values back in the given expression. f(x)ax^3 bx^2cxd

For x0 ; f(0)d (put x0 on both sides.) Or, -2d (since f(0)-2 given) Ie. d-2

Similarly, for x1 , f(1)abcd Or, 5abc-2 (since f(1)5 given and d-2) Or, abc7...............(1) For x-1, f(-1)-ab-cd (Note!) 3-ab-c-2 ( as d-2 and f(-1)3 ) Or, -ab-c5...........(2)

Adding (1) and (2) : 2b12 Ie. b6

Again for x2: f(2)8a4b2cd Or, 48a4*62c-2 since f(2)4. And d-2 Or, 8a242c6 b6. Obtained above.

Or, 8a2c -18

Or, 4ac-9...................(3)

Adding (2) and (3): 3a b-4 Or, 3a 6-4. (b6) So a-10/3

Put a-10/3 and b6 in (1), then

-10/3 6c7 So, c13/3

Now put the values of a,b, c and d in the given functon f(x)ax^3bx^2cxd f(x)-10/3 x^36x^213/3 x-2.

This is the required form.


Find a cubic function f(x) ax^3 bx^2 cx d?

Interesting problem. First, a local max or min is where the first derivative is zero (curve is flat).

f'(x) 3ax^2 2bx c, set this to zero and solve using the quadratic equation to yield:

-4, -2 -2b/6a /- sqrt (4b - 12ac)/6a call -2b/6a x and the other part y so you have -4 xy, -2 x-y

so -6 2x or x -3 and x is -2b/6a -3 or 9ab.

Plus this in for b to get 36a^2 81*3a^2 - 12ac or 360a^2 12ac or c 30a.Let's go back to the original two equations and plug these solutions in and solve the two equations for a.

4 a(-4)^3 9a(-4)^2 24a(-4) d

0 a(-2)^3 9a(-2)^2 24a(-2) d (subtract bottom from top)

4 4a or a1, b9, c24. Plug these in to solve for d and you get d20.

So the equation is f(x) x^3 9x^2 24x 20

Hope that helps!


I'm thinking of trading my 2006 Acura RsX for a Mazda CX-7. Good or bad idea?

Well, in terms of performance... RSX, TSX, Accord In terms of ride comfort.... Accord, TSX, RSX Really depends what you want, i own a RSX and was thinking about getting a TSX.. but its really just a RSX with 4 doors... So i couldnt justify the extra costs for the same feel So then ask yourself.

.. do you want 4 doors or 2.

.. Personally, i would go with the TSX because it doesnt have 2nd gear grind issues like the RSX-S has (all years/models) - TSX has nice things like xeon lights, etc.. I liked the Accord Coupe myself, and if i didnt want 4 doors, it would have been a serious option... But it doesnt handle as nice as your other two options.

.. although it WILL be cheaper to maintain/repair RSX has the smallest rear seats of all your options... the rear seats doesnt fit anyone comfortably... remember this (this is the reason im getting rid of it now) But all your options are pretty good.

.. you wont regret any of them.


In-Earphones: Shure SE102 vs Sennheiser CX 400/500 II?

In-earphone are a very personal preference. Fit and feel is different for every ear and it also depends on what type of music you are playing through them.

If you have not yet decided one way or another, I would like to toss another brand at you that you in which you might have interest. Ultimate ears makes some great in-earphones. While some of them cost around $250, one of their models ( 4vi - headset) only costs about $75 -80. These are some great phones for the price; with punchy bass, smooth mid-range, and crisp highs. They tend to sound a little muffled at ear wrecking volumes, but if you are like me, you like to listen to your music, not be killed by it. For the price, I've never heard a better pair of in-earphones.

Of course, when wanting the best sound, you must have the best recordings. So try to incorporate as many FLAC files in your music collection as possible.


ax^3 bx^2 cx d. find a,b,c,d given the inflection pt. and relative min.?

We have:

f(x) ax^3 bx^2 cx d

f'(x) 3ax^2 2bx c

f''(x) 6ax 2b

Since there is an inflection point at (0, 0), f''(x) 0 at x 0.

0 6a(0) 2b

> 2b 0

> b 0

Now our function reduces down to:

f(x) ax^3 cx d

f'(x) 3ax^2 c

Since there is a minimum at (2, -4), we have f'(x) 0 at x 2. Then:

0 3a(2)^2 c

> 12a c 0

We know that the function must pass through (0, 0) and (2, -4) as well. So:

f(x) ax^3 cx d

> 0 a(0)^3 c(0) d

> d 0

This now makes our equation:

f(x) ax^3 cx

Plugging in (2, -4):

-4 a(2)^3 c(2)

> 8a 2c -4

> 4a c -2

Since 12a c 0, we have the following system of equations: 12a c 0 4a c -2

We can subtract to get:

8a 2

> a 1/4


12a c 0

> c -12a

> c -12(1/4)

> c -3

Therefore, a 1/4, b 0, c -3, and d 0.

I hope this helps!


Show that the system of equations below has a unique solution if and only if bcad: axbys, cxbyt?

If you know about matrix determinants, the determinant of the coefficient matrix is:

| a b |

| c d | ad - bc

...and a linear system needs a nonzero determinant to have a unique solution. ab - cd 0 becomes ab cd in one step.

Another approach is to look at solving the system directly by elimination.

adx bdy ds . . . . multiply 1st equation by d

bcx bdy bt . . . . multiply the 2nd equation by b

(ad - bc)x 0 ds - bt . . . . then subtract to eliminate the y terms

x (ds - bt) / (ad - bc) . . . . and solve for x

That's a unique solution for x when and only when ad - bc 0, therefore ac bd is required for that unique solution to exist.

Now it's your turn. Do the same sort of elimination, starting from the two original equation, but eliminate x this time and solve for y. Do you get an equivalent result, where ad bc is required to make a denominator nonzero?


Solve ax b cx for x.?

For this, you want the equation to have X on its own on one side so:

x etc

First, you are going to want to get all x's to one side of the equals sign so you can -b from each side, and -cx from each side:

ax b -b -cx cx - cx - b


ax -cx -b

Now, to get x on its own, you need to factorise (ax -cx) which is simple enough because we can divide both by x to get a-c which we write as:

x(a-c) -b

Because x(a-c) x * a x * -c ax -ac

So now that we only have one x, we need to remove (a-c), so to do that we must divide each side by (a-c): (Sorry if all the brackets make it look more confusing)

x(a-c) /(a-c) -b /(a-c)

Simplfyed to:

X -b /(a-c)

Hope that helps! Understanding the answer is more important than the answer itself so feel free to e-mail me if you don't understand anything I explained.


how do you solve sin(axb)sin(cxd)?

This is kind of silly. You have four degrees of freedom. You can express one parameter, either a, b, c, d, or x, in terms of the others. But there are an uncountable infinitude of answers.

cos() sin(/2 - ),

so your equation is

sin(ax b) sin(/2 - cx - d).

Using the 2-periodicity of the sine function, all you can say is

ax b /2 - cx - d 2n, where n is any integer.

This produces

(ac)x (b d) (4n1)/2.

If a - c anything, then all solutions are of the form

b (4n1)/2 - d, for every integer n and every real number d.

Otherwise, the solutions are

x -(b d)/(a c) (4n1)/(2a2c)

where a, b, c, and d are any real numbers such that a -c and n is any integer.

That's it. Those two cases are all there is (you can substitute "complex number" in for "real number" where it appears.)

recommended articles
Why UX, UI, CX, IA, IxD, and Other Sorts of Design Are Dumb
Let me ask you: what do you do? What title do you put on the resume and portfolio? Why these words? I invite you to an exploration of how design titles and design directions are (not) connected with the real world. So, lets take a look at the current state of things. I guess youve seen different attempts to distinguish between UX and UI, UX and CX, user experience and product design, and so on. And you might have seen schemes about designer types like UI and UX designer, UX and product designer, etc. These adorable circle diagrams have got so sophisticated over time.If youve ever googled such stuff, you probably noticed these schemes give few answers and dont tell much about design and designers. Something significant is always missing value. Value for other people. Without value shown, such diagrams only serve a topic for designers snobbish chatter at 11 AM at the coffee machine. For the majority of people people who do not live in the world of pixels, fonts, and canvases its nonsense. I remember the time when I tried to enlighten clients and rolled my eyes at them when they confused terminology. Now I know for sure who created so-called clients from hell designers from hell. Such as me several years ago. We are in the trapping pit weve dug. Difference between UX, CX, UI, IxD, and other abracadabra doesnt ring people a bell because its theoretical and exists only in the designers imagination. UX/UI designer sounds as awkward as vegetable/carrot salad or vehicle/bus driver.Furthermore, designers abbreviations are the result of bad design. Think about this: can professionals who strive for clarity and simplicity call their jobs so unclearly that they need to explain them? UX/UI is the champion of dumbness. What does the slash mean, I wonder? So, you do both or one of them at a time? If these are two essential parts of one thing, why not call it with just one word? If these are different things, why do you do two jobs simultaneously? Moreover, why do two elements of different logical levels stand together? User experience is more general and exists before, after, and even without any interface. Why is the word user mentioned twice in this 4-letter acronym? Why is experience abbreviated to X, not E?Even such a popular title as User Experience Designer (UX Designer) is a goofy pleonasm, basically, using more words than needed. Its similar to saying Quality Assurance Tester, Talent Acquisition Recruiter, or Software Engineering Developer as if it gives you more importance. I have a hypothesis that the modern outbreak of creative design types and titles is naive resistance to stereotypes. Maybe we are adding descriptive words and replacing designer with strategist, architect, analyst, and developer to run away from make it look sexy. The latest trend is to call yourself a product designer or product manager. Product has become the new UX these days. Isnt it a vicious circle? The word design has lost its true meaning, and instead of bringing it back, we annihilate it employing all these evasive words.Why dont we call ourselves designers anymore? When did design cease to mean anything?All in all, there is no matter what you call yourself and your approach if the result of work lacks tangible value. If a designer draws wireframes, prepares prototypes, conducts workshops, but cannot deliver a solution for a problem, he or she is anything but a designer.So, what are designers supposed to do, in the first place? Where is the balance between focusing on a narrow area and being in charge of all design activities? Where is the verge between drawing mockups and influencing the world? There is a popular idea that a T-shaped skillset is the best for a designer. It means a designer has a deep competence in some area and decent knowledge in the rest of the design areas. However, we are living in a weird age when the design industry is evolving fast, and people risk to obtain two dangerous skillset types. I call them the dick-shaped designer and em-dash-shaped designer.The first one is a specialist who knows only one narrow area, and if anything is beyond it asks to consult the other specialist. Such skills dont allow to think strategically and keep the core value of what a team does in mind. I often hear, Oh fuff, I dont draw icons. Im a UX designer. I pass my wireframes to a UI guy. Or, I pick the color palette. Youd better ask about the business model that girl at the whiteboard. Whats next? Will there be Blue Button Designers? (Do not confuse with Red Button Designers.) Flat Icon Architects? Customer Journey Map Strategists? Principal Sticky Note Peelers? To feel how grotesque it sounds, try modifying non-design job titles: Steel Hammer Carpenter, Lurssen Yacht Sailor, Asian Flavor Cook, Beretta Gun Soldier, Canon Mark V Photographer.And since design thinking is a hype nowadays, there is another problem em-dash-shaped skills. These folks attend dozens of design conferences and courses and know a little bit about everything. Its not bad; we all used to be novices at some point. What is awkward is when they start to mention all the areas they pretend to know. For instance, UI/UX/Web/Mobile/Desktop Designer or Service/Product/Project Manager.You may disagree with the thoughts above, It sounds cool in theory. But these buzzwords are exactly what HRs, recruiters, and potential clients are looking for. Well, this is right to a certain extent. And what about professional dignity? If it becomes trendy to call our job Pixel Mover or Photoshop Operator, will we put that on our resumes?I think large companies have also contributed to unteaching designers to be designers. This zoo of design types is the result of granular work distribution in big teams. Designers are doing their small parts and gradually unlearn to see the final goal. Throw stones at me, but the end-to-end design process is a must for any designer, although they can specialize in something.Methods vary for every industry but the core is the same: research, ideation, validation, implementation. If we call ourselves designers, I believe we should take responsibility for the whole product fate even doing a small portion of work at a time. If icons, wireframes, mockups, icons, or prototypes are neat, but what people get is a disaster, designers havent done their work. Let me make myself clear. I dont promote being a design generalist versus a design specialist. Just pointing out our work is more responsible than we imagine.Now we can return to the questions from the beginning of the article. What are we? What are we actually doing? And here is another observation. Designers area of responsibility grows each year. Present-day titles more and more reflect how we work because there is not much difference between the principles of designing a mobile interface and a microwave oven. If you can design a thing, you can design anything, said Massimo Vignelli. It means the designers mindset is more important than tools, and youll learn the tools fast if you know what to do next.We should be able to show the measurable value of what we consider is right. Sometimes designers propose solutions that dont bring immediate income but, for example, attract loyal customers. Loyalty and the companys reputation will bring money in the future. The trick here is to show how its possible. Its like playing chess: the more steps ahead you think, the more credibility and trust you again. Understanding and proving the value of design is one of the basic topics in our profession. Photoshop, Sketch, pixel perfection, customer journey maps, visual language dont make us designers. The same way a hammer and a saw dont make someone a carpenter. We are designers when we solve problems and contribute to something valuable.There will always be people and situations that break the reputation of our profession. A popular meme says, There will always be someone who can do it cheaper. Fortunately, there are simple things everyone can do to support the credibility of designers.1. Call your job clearlyAfter the decades of evolution, only the word designer has left unchanged. If you put any words before designer check whether they can stay relevant for ten years or so. Beware of referring to one particular tool or methodology. This is your backstage; no one cares about it if your work brings value. When you come to the surgeon, you dont check the steel mark of their scalpel. In all times, reasoned clients werent searching for wireframe-artists and button-creators. They need problem-solvers and money-multipliers even if they dont say it directly. Specializing in something is good until it becomes an obstacle for understanding the whole picture. I like calling myself a designer. The fact that I often deal with interfaces (not interiors or clothes) becomes clear from the industry and company where I work.2. Showcase the value, not tasksIt might turn out that many works are lacking value. Oh, I know that from my own experience. I used to draw a lot of worthless concepts at the beginning of my design career. So, instead of Designed look and feel for a financial app, try measuring its effectiveness and telling about the 2x speed-up of the onboarding to a financial app. For the project Design of a logistics VR concept, consider calculating its impact like VR concept that estimatedly can save up to 40% of the delivery cost. Value can be financial earning or saving money and social making ones life better. Ive done is stronger and more result-oriented than I was doing.3. Collect and create the proofs of design impactClients will always be challenging our designs. The bigger a project is the more business risks relying on unproven designs. So we should learn from the evidence of design impact on business and people and generate such evidence. One of the recent cases is Forresters study on how design thinking techniques have affected the economic performance of IBM. On the other hand, there are widely-spread myths about the value of design. Its hard to extract design from all the activities and say something like, A week of designers work brings $10k income to our business. One of the famous fake facts states, $1 invested in design brings $100 of income. This idea is absent in the book it usually is associated with. The more we refer to such unproven factoids, the more we come across as artists. Its the designers responsibility to replace myths with science.More design inspiration in my blogRecommended materialsMuch more experienced and knowledgeable designers inspired me to write this humble article. By getting acquainted with their opinion too, youll have a broader picture of whats happening in the design world.Mike Monteiro, You Have Been Lied To, a recording of the keynote at Interaction 2015 conference. One of Mikes thoughts is that everything that helps designers to do their job is part of their job. Mike Monteiro, How Designers Destroyed the World, a recording of the speech at the USI event.Mike Monteiro, Designs Lost Generation, an article on designers professional ethics and making a choice between earning a living and doing what is right.Alan Cooper, When Companies Question the Value of Design, an article about the reasons designers cannot communicate the value of their work in terms of money. Bonus: George Carlin, On soft language and Flight announcements, two comic show episodes about the honesty in the words we use.Instead of post scriptum a recent tweet by the Father of Visual Basic.Feel free to get in touch elsewhere: Dribbble, Behance, Instagram, Twitter.
Age Approriate Discipline and Responsibilities for 9 Year Old Girl?
How to Replace Home Water Heater Thermostat?
What Would Be the State of Society Without Semiconductors? [closed]
6 Best Electric Water Kettle Reviews (Complete Guide)
Attract Your Target Audience to Your Business with the Best LED Signs
In 36 Hours, I May Be Sentenced to 18 Months in Prison. What Unwritten Rules Should I Know? Is 18 Mo
Camera and Cell Phone Use?
Bronze and Iron Age in Azerbaijan
The Development of VR Industry Should First Break Through Key Core Technologies and Vigorously Build
related searches
Why UX, UI, CX, IA, IxD, and Other Sorts of Design Are Dumb
Age Approriate Discipline and Responsibilities for 9 Year Old Girl?
How to Replace Home Water Heater Thermostat?
What Would Be the State of Society Without Semiconductors? [closed]
6 Best Electric Water Kettle Reviews (Complete Guide)
Attract Your Target Audience to Your Business with the Best LED Signs
In 36 Hours, I May Be Sentenced to 18 Months in Prison. What Unwritten Rules Should I Know? Is 18 Mo
Camera and Cell Phone Use?
Bronze and Iron Age in Azerbaijan

Copyright © 2020 Concises YuGa Sports | Sitemap